George Zimmerman Trial

[crsublette]

Due to how it was a pitch black night with poor street lights, Zimmerman should have constantly had a big flashing spotlight on his gun in the open with a sign saying, " hey dude, I got a gun and will defend myself. Got one question, ' Do you feel lucky punk? ' ... Go ahead, jump me. " Also, have led lights highlighting his neighborhood watch badge. Then, he would have a quick followup, " Jump me, then I will shoot you and self inflict my injuries so I can claim self defense. "

Sounds about right. That's it... I persuaded myself, sounds good enough, I've changed my mind

 

[Koigal50]

six women on the jury. What was his lawyers thinking? He's sunk.

 

[dieselplower]

six women on the jury. What was his lawyers thinking? He's sunk.

I can only see this post as an attempt at trolling. And a poor one at that.

 

[Koigal50]

I guess everybody has a right to there opinion.

And my opinion is, he will be convicted of something. If not, lucky him.

You have good trolling methods, too.

 

[dieselplower]

I guess everybody has a right to there opinion.

And my opinion is, he will be convicted of something. If not, lucky him.

You have good trolling methods, too.

Actually I'd love to hear your opinion about why an all woman jury, where 5 of them are white, is a bad idea? The guy was defending himself from a proven thug and drug user. And to top it off, he was black. Who would be more afraid of that description than a white woman? I think the jury selection works perfectly for the defense.

 

[Koigal50]

Because I, don't see things as black and white or Spanish or anything like that. All male human beings have the potential to be scary to women. A woman, is a mother first. We are generically encode with the emotion card, more so than men. We feel more empathy for others and can put ourselves into our young (colorblind, mind you) son's situation.

At least I hope to think that's true. Only my humble opinion.

 

[dieselplower]

So as a mother would you feel your son should be able to defend himself from a vicious, thug, druggie like Martin? Or should your son just have let his head be bashed in until his brains spilled out onto the concrete?

 

[CdnJCR]

That is the entire ball of wax my Canadian friend. But lets go with it.

IF America had Canada's border control abilities, then it would be different. Next time Canada needs military aid, then don't look to your southern neighbors, but no worries, we'll still help ya since we're good like that.

When did Canada receive USA military aid ?

 

[dieselplower]

The USA indirectly provides aid to Canada every single day. No-one will attack Canada because they know full well that we will destroy them. In fact, I bet our "leaders" would defend Canada more forcefully than they defend the USA.

Back on topic... I cant wait for the verdict to be announced ...

 

[crsublette]

When did Canada receive USA military aid ?

Hmmm. World War 2.

The French saved America at the formation of her so that American can be the world's military power so we can save others. I'm not a history buff, but the trend is that folk do not want help due to America's military, and, if we do not help, then some how their mangled thinking is always mutated to say it is America's fault or responsibility since we have been the primary world power, which is on the decline due to adverserial politics.

 

[crsublette]

The USA indirectly provides aid to Canada every single day. No-one will attack Canada because they know full well that we will destroy them. In fact, I bet our "leaders" would defend Canada more forcefully than they defend the USA.

Back on topic... I cant wait for the verdict to be announced ...

Exactly.

 

[Koigal50]

He made a bad decision getting out of the car. For both of them. I think he did kill him in fear for his life at that point. I don't think he went out intestinally to kill someone. But neither does a drunk driver and they get prosecuted for a poor decision as well as they should be.

Talk about exaggerating the truth, thug, druggie. Do you know anything about teenager and their experimenting stages, in todays world. I'm not saying it's right, but their not thug druggies, either.

 

[crsublette]

I don't think he went out intestinally to kill someone.

Although, if he was hungry enough, then I bet he would have killed someone.

 

[dieselplower]

He made a bad decision getting out of the car. For both of them. I think he did kill him in fear for his life at that point. I don't think he went out intestinally to kill someone. But neither does a drunk driver and they get prosecuted for a poor decision as well as they should be.

Talk about exaggerating the truth, thug, druggie. Do you know anything about teenager and their experimenting stages, in todays world. I'm not saying it's right, but their not thug druggies, either.

Ok now I know you haven't followed the case at all. And you just found him "not guilty" when you admitted he "killed him in fear for his life". To compare someone who is in fear of losing their life to someone who kills someone while driving drunk makes absolutely no sense.

 

[crsublette]

Talk about exaggerating the truth, thug, druggie. Do you know anything about teenager and their experimenting stages, in todays world. I'm not saying it's right, but their not thug druggies, either.

Except it proves motivation on the kids behalf. Since the kid was often found to initiate assaults, then it would definitely apply here. However, at the mention of it and documentary evidence, the Judge instantly threw a huge emotional fit about it, threw out the evidence, and told the jury to disregard.