Nah, 35.5 was when he had the heater and aeration going. 32.9 was when he only had the aeration running.
I think this guys method is not holding up to the claims he makes, that the bottom temp with the aeration drawing extra heat should be at 6C or 43F. It's not even close.
This might be one of those cases of " works for me, may not work for you, since everyone's pond is different like a snowflake ". Honestly, this may sound insensitive, if people, such as the "local pond expert" you talked to can't reliably give good advice, then they should just always add a disclaimer saying "this probably will not work for you". I think it is just much better to explain why things happen and then let the reader or listener make up their own mind according on the best plan of action.
I've read all this through several times now. Sounds like, with the density of water changing when below 39*F (assuming this general number since contaminants can change it). Then, your readings make sense. Water movement from either wind, areation, or pump flow should break up the stratification if the water movement is intense enough throughout entire pond and not localized to a general area. Simple areation and simple pump flow is quite localized so you might still see some stratification in areas; however, if your pond is properly built managing water currents, then you should see zero stratification.
I don't know if a pond 4~6 foot is deep enough for any noticeable geo-thermal warmth. If any warmth, then it is probably just enough to provide a constant enthalpy preventing the entire pond from freezing; this all depending on the depth of your soil freeze line .
My perspective is I think the aeration or any water flow from pumps functions the same by simply ensuring continuity of O2 saturation, except there has to be more heat displacement with the aeration. I don't see how pumping cold air into a body would not act like an air conditioner, displacing some heat that is in the water. However, it's probably not enough heat displacement to offest the enthalpy provided by the 4 foot depth of the pond. Personally, I am with Coleen in that favoring water movement versus aeration, unless you can rig the aeration where it is pumping air from inside a house or something like Craig mentions; however, it is easier and cheaper to do aeration and aeration does provide a tremendous amount of water flow.