JohnHuff
I know nothing.
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2012
- Messages
- 2,257
- Reaction score
- 1,621
- Location
- At my computer
- Hardiness Zone
- 1a
- Country
1) There are charts on the internet showing the difference in surface area of different types of media and some showing how to calculate the area of media needed, sorry I don't have those websites on the top of my head. I haven't attempted to quantify mine because the advantage of floating media is so obvious over static media.
2) Increased flow is supposed to help the nitrifying reactions, up to a certain point.
Your last comment... it does appear that floating media is more expensive than pads. In the filters that I built last year I used 3 types, bioballs, K2 and cut up straws. I'm not sure how much cut up straws cost me since I have a habit of collecting them, but I think they might be quite inexpensive without a very big loss in efficiency. I can suggest going that route as well.
2) Increased flow is supposed to help the nitrifying reactions, up to a certain point.
Your last comment... it does appear that floating media is more expensive than pads. In the filters that I built last year I used 3 types, bioballs, K2 and cut up straws. I'm not sure how much cut up straws cost me since I have a habit of collecting them, but I think they might be quite inexpensive without a very big loss in efficiency. I can suggest going that route as well.
capewind said:Thanks John, that did help, but now I am scratching my head with more questions ...
1. In evaluating usable surface area, first, how do you define HOW MUCH media you need? I realize that is a loaded question and could depend on many variables, but for sake of arguement use the terms of an average fish load, and only address it from the size of the filter... In our case, using a 150 gallon stock tank ...
2. My next question regards flow rate ... I vaguely recall others talking about particle suspension time and flow rates, and the skippy is upflow ... but what if you add additional agitation to the skippy tank .. whether it be in the form of a venturi, added air pump, or top discharge water ... I may not be explaining this well ... I wanted more flow coming out of the waterfall, so hubby has a valve box ... it is set so that about 1000 gph is fed through the upflow, and the balance is plumbed to enter the skipping from the backside (opposite the water fall) at the top ... this pump will be swapped out to a 4000 gph (needs a new impeller), where 1000 gph will go through the upflow, and the 3000 gph across the top to give me more flow at the waterfall ... It also has a venturi ... Does the added flow help anything at all, besides giving me more volume at the falls?
Where I am heading with these questions is financial .. if the course media is substancially less expensive, is figuring out how much is needed, to get the same end result ... I also remember others talking about other items that would be dynamic in nature, such as cut pex tubing (hubby has done this), pvc and even hair curlers ...