- Joined
- Sep 18, 2020
- Messages
- 3,314
- Reaction score
- 3,601
- Location
- Pacific NW
- Hardiness Zone
- 8b
- Country
There is no perfect energy source. No utopia. Every source of power has a downside and, if relied on 100% would lead to massive problems down the road. The only sane answer is a mixture of sources. And that is something we will have to monitor and debate for eternity because the world changes, resources shift and things that worked yesterday don't always work today.
Coal is easy and cheap to mine but does massive environmental damage and is dirty as hell to burn even when you scrub it. Gas is plentiful in pockets around the country, but extracting it creates earthquakes and makes drinking water flammable. Nuclear can produce massive energy but also comes with massive risk to life when it breaks and can be used to develop hugely destructive weapons programs. Hydro is practically free over the long-term but seriously messes up aquatic life. Solar + batteries can create energy independence/security like no other source and reduce grid demand, but even its theoretical max efficiency can't power us alone and it's ability to be recycled is not good.
There is no one answer. We should use all our available resources in a mix that makes sense for where they are being used and pay attention to what effect that mix has on our environment and make shifts when we see undesirable outcomes.
What we definitely shouldn't do is wave our hands at new technology just because it isn't good enough and assume that the solution is to just keep doing things the way we always have and hope something we don't control will change so that we don't have to.
Coal is easy and cheap to mine but does massive environmental damage and is dirty as hell to burn even when you scrub it. Gas is plentiful in pockets around the country, but extracting it creates earthquakes and makes drinking water flammable. Nuclear can produce massive energy but also comes with massive risk to life when it breaks and can be used to develop hugely destructive weapons programs. Hydro is practically free over the long-term but seriously messes up aquatic life. Solar + batteries can create energy independence/security like no other source and reduce grid demand, but even its theoretical max efficiency can't power us alone and it's ability to be recycled is not good.
There is no one answer. We should use all our available resources in a mix that makes sense for where they are being used and pay attention to what effect that mix has on our environment and make shifts when we see undesirable outcomes.
What we definitely shouldn't do is wave our hands at new technology just because it isn't good enough and assume that the solution is to just keep doing things the way we always have and hope something we don't control will change so that we don't have to.