Dr. Novak, I understand your time is limited through the day so I hope this post is not too cumbersome to answer while not holding you back from answering others.
I do see you are a windy guy, but it's a good type of windy that helps to produce a bit of educational energy.
Thank ya Dr. Novak for your well written honesty. You will find many many bog owners and static submerged bio-filters owners here in this forum and they're good folk. Everyone on here are really good folk. This forum never gets heated like it does on koiphen.com and I think this is a big credit to the better community here on the Garden Pond Forum.
If times allows, then direct answers to questions will definitely be appreciated. I understand your time constraints so I honestly do appreciate the effort you take here.
Not sure I followed that completely. Your point is that in still water Anoxic system bacteria can produce enough O2 to stay aerobic and alive? While other filters, lacking the negative charge can't attract ammonium ions and therefore can't stay as aerobic?
I will assume your questions are rhetorical and, which leads me to say, you are correct Waterbug.
Dr. Novak's response in the better koiphen thread that, I hyperlinked, stating, "In each basket, small amounts of oxygen have actually been tested and shown to usually stay slightly above 1.5-.5mg/l. The ability to retain some oxygen appears to keep the majority of the bed in an 'anoxic” state.'
My read on this is that I suppose the ions attract the carbon dioxide and other possible oxygen molecules to utilize for the process.
In still water the advantage goes to Anoxic. If water is kept moving the non Anoxic would be OK.
Now this has me bugged since I it does not make much sense.
Dr. Novak, can you elaborate in answering to Waterbug's statement above?
So lets say you have an 8”X4”X18-24” deep filter. Properly diffused inlet water, with 20 -30 Biocenosis Baskets (my filter has 20 Biocenosis Baskets) in it 7000 -8000 gph easily. Your waterfall will look great with that much water going through it but you can do 5000-gph and still be safe. I show a photo of and 8000 gph small waterfall in my book on
www.mankysanke.co.uk CD-Book in English....
http://liofornellino.blogfree.net CD-Book in Italian .
Focused on "properly diffused inlet water". Dr. Novak, what does this mean?
I have a 110 gallon whiskey barrel cut in half where I put a bog in each half. I am digging out these whiskey barrels to create your anoxic filtration system. Due to the tight quarters, the bottom of the barrels appear to be the best placement of the diffusor. What would your advice be in this scenario?
If I told you my fish load in my 1200-gal pond had 17 large Koi in it (smallest being 16” and 3@ 27” 5@24” and 5 @ 18-22”) and that was with 20- biocenosis baskets in a 400-gal filter; Photo of pond in my book. That 1200-gal is filter and 780-gal fishpond. People thought I was being cruel to the animals for such a heavy fish load but it was to show people what can be done if done right.
I have read the exact same experience with properly built, 55 gal or bigger, moving bed filters. Any thoughts?
At the same time a Koi judge from our MPKS club was in my yard and had to tell people “Do not try this with a conventional filter!!! But also admitted that my fish looked very healthy and eyes were clear, color sharp and happy. Now that right from a Koi judges mouth not mine.
Your usage of "conventional filter" has me bugged. You use this phrase several times. Dr. Novak, can you expand on what this means? Are you referring to the moving bed bio-filters or the shower tower type bio-filters?
I completely agree with you in saying that "all filters work…they do perform a purpose that is sometimes compromised by the hobbyists or other unforeseen insults that weren’t added into the equation when setting the filter up. Each filter that we use has its limits and the hobbyist easily reaches those limits."
Slamming the "other guys", that is your competitors, as "conventional". This comes across as an unneccesary low blow and, Dr. Novak, this is one of the many reasons why my skepticism raises an eyebrow against your system when reading the testimonials that you have chosen to present.
I will also add right now that the foot print of the Anoxic filter is not small. This is done for a purpose. Imitation sewage treatment facilities and/or a car engine: There is no substitution for cubic inches when it comes to filtration systems or horse power.
However, the only reason we have the technology today is due to our ability to etch circuitry using the least amount of cubic inches due to the physics of the matter. I think this is the point, that is doing more with less space, of moving bed and shower tower bio-filters.
Sure, Dr. Novak, your anoxic filtration rendition allows for easy disguising when compared to these other "conventional" bio-filters since these other filters do not allow plants to be interfaced directly with the filter. So, hedges or other landscaping is used to hide the "conventional" filters.
For hobbyist, talking about any electrically charge substrates was never mentioned because they didn’t know. Scientists knew about water being electrically charge along with substrates they were using. It wasn’t until the nineties that electrically charged substrates and water and air topography was even mentioned being electrically charged. To this day many hobbyists do not understand the science behind electrically charge substrates and water, or they just don’t care. Because of this, it doesn’t matter which way the water flows through a bog filter; because if the substrate isn’t aggressively cleaned it will fill with detritus and block all chemical and biological pathways. Only in extremely fast moving or high pressure water flows that has the ability to agitated the substrate and expel any detritus will the substrate stay open to chemical and biological pathways. As we all know this just is not a feasible alternative moving thousands of pounds of gravel continuously.
Extremely interesting.
I enjoy reading a type of very detail oriented publications.
Dr. Novak, can you provide any references to help me better understand these processes, that is the biological electrical charges, you are talking about ?? Can you provide any references to Dr. Franco's publications ??