Mucky_Waters said:
Problem with pet care and protection laws the lines between pets, livestock, living decoration can easily get blurred. Even when it comes to cats and dogs in some parts of the world they are thought of as food as much as they are alarm systems or pets, and there are probably more fish kept in ponds for food then there are kept as pets. Lots of people care for, and love their pet insects and rodents, and yet lots of people raise insects and rodents to feed to other pets or creature kept for breeding purposes. You yourself know that big koi breeders often euthanize much of their unwanted stock. And when it comes to what creature deserve to be given special rights, you can't simple go by animal intelligence either, even if you did have an accurate way of measuring it, because many of the animals humans eat have rather high intelligence compared to many of the animals we choose to keep as pets. So deciding whether a plow horse deserves more rights then a pet mosquito can actually be a tricky thing.
Personally, I think there are far too many dogs and cats out there. I won't go into all the examples of improperly cared for cats and dogs just in my neighborhood alone, but I would have to say more then 50% of them shouldn't have pets at all for one reason or another. I'd like to see people have to get a special pet care licence before they can own a dog or a cat, just like you have to get a drivers licence before you can drive a car. This alone would help educate pet owners,and impress upon people the responsibility of being a pet owner, and vastly cut down on the number of feral animals and neglected pets in this world.
However, when it comes to people being harmed by animal under the care of other people, there should be no question of accountability. The owners should be held totally responsible as though they were the ones inflicting the harm themselves.
Yeah, I pretty much agree with ya. Not gonna touch this subject, except for a brief moment.
I am totally against massive extension of animal protection laws. Sure, there is a place for them in regards to properly citing folk who intentional abuse them, but it seems too many folk want to blur the lines such as PETA by comparing chicken farmers to the nazis and I definitely do not want folk like PETA to get more authority under the law.
I try to keep farm cats. I "try" since my equipment headquarters is near a couple quite busy farm to market roads, I lose a occasional cat due to crawling into equipment and being transported to a field somewhere, and then I have coyotes and other wildlife out here. I like farm cats since they keep the rodent population under control and their cat food is cheaper than the constant poison I put out and there are many places where poison does not work. Also, the farm cats reproduce quite well. I always have at least a dozen cats and a few of them have been smart enough to stay around for quite a while.
For the farm cats, I have little raised and protected feeding stations and they come to my pond for water, but this is not good enough for some folk. When I go somewhere to try to find more farm cats, they ask all sorts of question in regards to proper shelter such as little sheds all over the place, additional security, and proper veterinarian care. Ugh, now, you are talking about hundreds upon hundreds to nearly thousands of dollars to keep farm cats to do what they have always
traditionally done in the past!!!
I don't have much respect for these
unreasonable pet advocates, by attempting to compare the animal to a human child. Don't give me this absurb nonesense of, " aren't we all animals? " I do support the mission of some of them such as sending money to a no-kill dog pound near me, that is since I want them to get better security and more cages due to their dang dogs keep on getting loose/escaping and come to terrorize my cats.