Not sure I would jump to the conclusion that you have a leak. The waterfall strength is going to be determined by the volume of water you have, the width of the spillway and the height of the drop. You cannot change the volume of the barrel and that is fairly small. If you narrow the spillway then you would create more pressure and might get the affect you are looking for and the bigger the drop the more splash you will get. Others here probably have more technical solutions, dont give up.I received the pump today, 8000l = 2000g an hour. And yet there is no difference. My assumption is water's being lost somewhere, the silicone is not holding, or maybe this is normal, and I am expecting too much. I think I am getting close to the part where I hang up the idea of a spillway because if this is normal there is no aeration.
I've realized it is also the hose limiting flow, though im not sure i'll get much aeration even on the biggest hose, but yeah I guess narrowing it would helpNot sure I would jump to the conclusion that you have a leak. The waterfall strength is going to be determined by the volume of water you have, the width of the spillway and the height of the drop. You cannot change the volume of the barrel and that is fairly small. If you narrow the spillway then you would create more pressure and might get the affect you are looking for and the bigger the drop the more splash you will get. Others here probably have more technical solutions, dont give up.
Connecting the hose to the pipe I think you have two options. Most here use the PVC primer and glue, easy to use. Some people also use Fernco couplings, easy to find at Home Depot/Lowes for the size you want. Some people say Fernco couplings could fail in a few years and then others say they have had them for years with no issues.I am now wondering what is the best way to attach a hose to a pipe. This is one of those flexible PVC hoses, advertised for gluing. I am thinking of connecting a pipe to a bulkhead, 90 turn then another pipe and then I glue the hose, possibly add a valve as well. I don't have enough hose to put it where I want to without doing this pipework, and currently the hose connected directly to bulkhead sprays some water out which is a problem, so I thought this would kill two flies at once and I can possibly easily attach a valve too.
With the 19mm I used a hose connector and connected it to the bulkhead using a reducer, it was easy enough to thread it in. And my guess is that would also limit flow a lot because of how its designed cause its a small hole. Using pipes would ensure that does not happen. These are just guesses, I've never seen anyone use a hose connector though on these forums, that was something family thought of it and we used it, but I feel it is not up to the task. And it's annoying to deal with as well.
I have this reducer on the bulkhead to 32mm, and it has a thread, so I suppose I need some sort of pipe which will thread in, and then I deal with gluing flex later when I get the pipes on.Connecting the hose to the pipe I think you have two options. Most here use the PVC primer and glue, easy to use. Some people also use Fernco couplings, easy to find at Home Depot/Lowes for the size you want. Some people say Fernco couplings could fail in a few years and then others say they have had them for years with no issues.
Highly recommend that valve, I have three and they are so much easier to use than ball valves. They cost more but in my opinion well worth it. Gives a lot of flexibility in controlling the flow of water.I have this reducer on the bulkhead to 32mm, and it has a thread, so I suppose I need some sort of pipe which will thread in, and then I deal with gluing flex later when I get the pipes on.
View attachment 161636
As for the pipe not sure either, there are those gray pipes, but they seem to have rubber seals or something in them and I'm not sure they'd work for gluing? And then there are the other normal ones with no rubber.
I am looking to use this as well, I thought it may be a useful feature.
View attachment 161637
They are still ball valves. they just have a built in union and they are beyond being handy . but they are not needed on every location where a ball valve is neededHighly recommend that valve, I have three and they are so much easier to use than ball valves. They cost more but in my opinion well worth it. Gives a lot of flexibility in controlling the flow of water.
i wouldn't be in so much of a hurry to do so . Wetland filters can take some timeto get established . even if the water clears it can be a while before the bacteria etc gets a good grip on your systemCan't wait to get rid off this awful looking box filter.
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.