adavisus said:
It was proven by a court that if you are being stalked by some malicious thug don't give them any chance to pull a gun.
Zimmerman had zero history of initiating assaults on his record in the past. If so, I gaurantee you that the Prosecution would have been allowed to talk all about it due to everything else he was allowed to get away with. I guess a fella
not having an assault history means it is reasonable to call him a malicious thug.
Ironicly, the kid was the one with the actual history of being a thug, that is initiating assaults, yet even though the judge told the jury to disregard and forced the defense to
not release this documentary evidence. Glad the jury saw through these shenanigans.
Even though Zimmerman is the guy that managed and counseled troubled black youth, who have had or still have fathers in prison and absent, so to help these youth to not do what Trayvon has done, Zim is still the guy being called the malicious thug. Robert Zimmerman talks all about this on the Piers Morgan show, but yet folk call Zimmerman the thug.
While it was at night, the kid circled Zimmerman's car while he was in it, meaning the kid was essentially challenging him, then the kid continued on to lurk around on folk's front yard as testified by witnesses, and, with the past history of all the house robberies within just that week, this persuaded Zimmerman to view the kid's actions as susipisous activity, that of describing the actions of a punk.
Yet, folk some how distort this to view Zimmerman is a gun waving thug. There is zero evidence, of anything by witness testimonial, that indicates Zimmerman was the thug in this confrontation.
If all it takes for someone to be called a thug is being a conceal gun carrier, calling a kid a punk due to the kid's suspicious activity, and simply just getting out of the car to make sure the kid was not up to to no good, then do not go out at night, lurking around, creating suspisious activity.