Meyer Jordan
Tadpole
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2014
- Messages
- 7,177
- Reaction score
- 5,678
- Location
- Pensacola, Florida
- Hardiness Zone
- 9a
- Country
I would think the pea gravel better because of more surface area and even if I have to back flush, would think the smaller gravel would keep the water column cleaner. I
You are thinking of the 'bog' as a mechanical filter and it should not be thought of this way. It should be considered as only a bio-filter. The water entering the 'bog' should be pre-filtered in some manner in order to keep the TSS to the lowest possible level. By not providing this pre-filtration the 'bog', depending on the water quality of the pond, will immediately begin to filter out these solids and in doing so also immediately begin to clog. The rate at which the 'bog' will clog is in direct relation to the TSS of the pond water.
This steady clogging of the 'bog' also progressively reduces any biological filtration that may be attainable with a clear system. This is one reason that I prefer the use of the matrix cubes. Coupled with a reduced flow rate any TSS that is not captured by the pre-filter is allowed to settle out before it reaches the gravel layer.
I feel that if I have to consider the 'bog' handling the bulk of mechanical filtration then somewhere there is a flaw in my design.