Thank you Craig! Stretching the wall made a lot of sense. I think what confuses me the most is I *DO* have basic understanding of genetics in the regards to dominant and recessive traits, but they are applied somewhat differently than in fish from what I am understanding. We used to breed/show both Persian cats, and in dogs, Mastiffs.
To OVERLY simplify, in solid color Persians for example, the genes are sex linked, and white, while visible as a color, really is invisible, and is "masking" either red or black, either as a dominant (red or black) or as a dilute (cream or blue). If you were to breed a black queen, to a red stud, you are only going to get red or black kittens (dilute is only possible if one or both parents carry the dilute gene), and the gender will be linked. The female kittens would be red, and the male kittens would be black. Even if a grandparent was a parti color, you will NOT produce a parti color kitten from this pairing.
Now in the Mastiffs... If you bred a red (apricot) to a red (apricot), obviously, you could get apricot puppies, but you could also get the dilute cream (fawn) coloring as well. In this case, the fawn gene is most dominant within the breed. But if you bred fawn to fawn, both dilutes, you could NOT get an apricot, the dominant form of red. Breeding apricot to fawns, easy to understand you could get both apricots and fawns. In the Mastiff breed, there are also brindles. No way possible to get a brindle puppy unless one of the parents happend to be a brindle. The brindle gene has two alles, as a multi color gene, and both genes need to be present to be reproduced.
So while slightly different, both in the Persians and Mastiffs, there is gene predictably that I am having a hard time stretching to include fish. What I am grasping of the fish is they can express color combinations going back to say the 3rd or further generations??? OR am I totally losing the grasp here, and would it be simplified that the fish's gene pool hasnt been manipulated as tightly as per se the dogs have been, so fish are still more of a wild card in expression???