j.w
I Love my Goldies
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2010
- Messages
- 33,901
- Reaction score
- 20,873
- Location
- Arlington, Washington
- Showcase(s):
- 1
- Hardiness Zone
- USDA 8a
- Country
That's a very nice pond Anthony! It looks so natural I can't believe it's man made!
But the pump set up could be the same just without the fountain head .They just float the pump in that set up so it does not get clogged up
Herz, they also do this with planted aquariums, use a real soil mixture. Here is a link.
http://www.plantedta...-pros-cons.html
I've had wildlife ponds, both lined and mud bottom.
Adding clay soil is better imo than loam or top soil. Lots of organics in top soil that float. You can skim it off of course. But clay is more like what would be there. Adding soil is just a way to jump start the process. You can add leaves if you like as food for the insects. Leaves aren't as messy.
You can run a pump, but generally it should be on the small side. A pump isn't needed since we're talking about creating an environment for creatures evolved for still conditions. Adding O2 can mess things up by giving one bug a leg up over another bug. I wouldn't run the pump as you are adding soil, nor point putting grit through it. And I'd let it settle. Wildlife ponds take a lot longer to get going. Can take days, weeks for the muddy water to settle.
Most wildlife ponds I ran into did have fish, even a few goldfish. But small minnow type fish were more the norm, looked more natural.
It isn't commonly thought mosquito dunks kill dragonfly larvae, or most other bugs. I've read people in pond forums say they used dunks and still had dragonfly larvae for what that's worth. I haven't seen any specific testing. However, we're talking about a wildlife pond, mosquitoes are an important part of that mix. Lots of things eat mosquito larve. Minnows can be a part of that, but there are bugs that eat the larva as it hatches, when too small for fish. So I wouldn't use any mosquito control except during start up if I could actually see mosquito larva.
With water gardens you really don't need to understand much about how ponds work. There's not a lot going on. Wildlife ponds really require a more fact based understanding wholistic approach. The best thing you can do is forget everything you know about ponds because almost everything about water gardens is myth. Muck is toxic, still water is toxic, Skippy is required for clear water, moving water is needed for O2, on and on the myths will fall.
Wildlife ponds are much less about control, and all about seeing how nature runs a pond.
I shall give them a try in there addy!
Here's what it looked like at one time. It's a mess right now. Need to clean it out and put in the litter and start over w/ the smaller type lilies. See what big leaves the ones I have in there now have.
Hi,
I'm new here, and my pond sort of fits your description. It is a small pond with a liner that I hand dug into the base of a granite ledge. I use a small pump that feeds a canister filter, and the out flow forms a small stream between the natural rock and then trickles down into the pond.
The pond is located on a wooded lot under a several large trees. We get a lot of wildlife visitors including wood frogs, peepers and dragonflies (or maybe they are damsel flies). Lots of birds visit all year round, from bluebirds to wild turkeys, and deer often stop by for a drink.
The water is clear and we have a small school of goldfish and koi who are quite happy and doing well. But the pond is far from the glass-clear water that I see in many of the ponds featured here. I refer to it as a naturalistic pond, and I like it's cottage garden appearance. I hope you like it! Cheers!
Maybe some wires got crossed, but to be clear, the vast majority of "ponds in nature" I've had experience with were man made and did not have any influx of freshwater other than rain. One pond I knew did have springs. All ponds I knew are what people would call "stagnant". Most everyone where I grew up had a mud bottom pond or two and no one called them "stagnant". City people would, but they really had no clue.i know the usual argument you are referring too, that all ponds in nature have an influx of freshwater, but I know several around here that become stagnant in the middle of summer when the creeks dry up and we don't get rain for days on end and all the wildlife is doing just fine.
Maybe some wires got crossed, but to be clear, the vast majority of "ponds in nature" I've had experience with were man made and did not have any influx of freshwater other than rain. One pond I knew did have springs. All ponds I knew are what people would call "stagnant". Most everyone where I grew up had a mud bottom pond or two and no one called them "stagnant". City people would, but they really had no clue.
To me ponds are a spectrum from wildlife pond on one end and swimming pools on the other. I use water garden to describe everything between wildlife and Koi pond which is a pretty wide range.
A great feature for attracting wildlife is a big shallow area, like 1" to 3" deep. Great for bird bathing. Keep brush back maybe 5' so cats can't ambush and plant taller shrubs around it to give the birds a place to stage and see if it's safe. Tall shrubs can reduce hawk attacks. The birds seem to feel safer anyways. One of my favorite ponds just because of the amount of birds.
Herz sounds like it is going to be a neat wildlife pond. Can't wait to see the construction pics and the final result.
That's the fun part.know my design on this will be a little out of the box type thinking
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.