when you can forecast massive warm weather systems rolling over the north pole you can forecast the pulverised arctic polar vortexes are going walkabouts, and methane clathrates closer to rising
View attachment 96494
It's a wash until you factor in the increase in the cost of food. Just like electric cars. They sound good and feel good but are no good.The amount of fossil fuels needed to produce ethanol to add to gasoline........is a wash.
It's a wash until you factor in the increase in the cost of food. Just like electric cars. They sound good and feel good but are no good.
They say the space program is the biggest polluter and also has cause the earths axis to move .We are tilted because of it .What have we gained from it except pictures of other planets .We have destroyed the universe with our space junk .Will we ever gain anything from it except destroying the pristine universe .
The concept is good but they produce more harmful byproducts than a good old gas guzzler. From the motors to the batteries there are many parts that have to be recycled or put in the dump. Plus making the parts adds pollution and they require rare earth materials that have to be shipped form far away which in turn uses resources then they have to be charged with electricity which again requires more energy and could put a drain on the grid if enough cars were on the road (think of summer heat waves and electric grid browning). Then there is the basic cost of the car and the need for a government subsidy to get the average person to buy one. Then there is the outrageous cost of a new set of batteries should you need one or the energy needed to try and recycle them and put them to sue again if possible. If that's not enough then try to find a place to recharge a car in three minutes.Why do you believe that electric vehicles are "no good"?
Now we're talking my language. This is what should be happening with climate research. Instead of figuring out how to stop nature they need to start researching how to take advantage of it. But I guess I'm repeating myself. I loved the space project and everything it brought.First, Who is "they"?
I would venture to say that the biggest benefit of the space program is weather forecasting. Satellites have proven to be of immense value not only in improved general forecasting but also in tropical cyclone forecasting, likely saving many lives. Satellites have also provided the means of general environmental observation from a vantage point that enables the tracking of trends, whether it be droughts, glacier melt or gaseous pollution.
Of course there have been other benefits such as improvements in water filtration, artificial limbs etc.
The concept is good but they produce more harmful byproducts than a good old gas guzzler. From the motors to the batteries there are many parts that have to be recycled or put in the dump. Plus making the parts adds pollution and they require rare earth materials that have to be shipped form far away which in turn uses resources then they have to be charged with electricity which again requires more energy and could put a drain on the grid if enough cars were on the road (think of summer heat waves and electric grid browning). Then there is the basic cost of the car and the need for a government subsidy to get the average person to buy one. Then there is the outrageous cost of a new set of batteries should you need one or the energy needed to try and recycle them and put them to sue again if possible. If that's not enough then try to find a place to recharge a car in three minutes.
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.