The clean outs aren't necessary in my eyes it's so smallAnd the first time you power goes out all your bacteria will dry out and you'll start from square one all over again
The clean outs aren't necessary in my eyes it's so smallAnd the first time you power goes out all your bacteria will dry out and you'll start from square one all over again
Hi CometKeith. We were talking about possibly building a bigger pond (EPDM liner, we could fit something like 10x10ft or so) in the future, but not this year. Then we got the small preformed liner at garage sale one week ago, so we decided to make a smaller hole before we decide whether we want to go bigger and deeper.Hi Sugar. So I’m just wondering is your pond location constrained by size? My very first pond was a kit with a liner that held 150 gallons and to me that would be a starting size. Are you concerned about winter weather at all? If you get ice and snow you should make your pond at least 3 ft deep. Good luck with your pond!
And the first time you power goes out all your bacteria will dry out and you'll start from square one all over again
The water would go to waterfall through piece of flexible tube. So the pump pumps water to the bog through flexible tube which is attached to the bottom pipe and another flexible tube attached on the opposite side of the pipe takes the water up to waterfall. The other 2 ends of pipe will be capped.Also, I just looked at what you wrote again and am confused as to how you plan to route the water out of the tub into the small preformed waterfall? Did you know maccourt makes a 20 gallon tub with a waterfall spillway built into it? You can get it from Home Depot and it would be infinitely simpler than trying to figure out some way of getting the water out of the tub and into the little 2 gallon waterfall form.
The water would go to waterfall through piece of flexible tube. So the pump pumps water to the bog through flexible tube which is attached to the bottom pipe and another flexible tube attached on the opposite side of the pipe takes the water up to waterfall. The other 2 ends of pipe will be capped.
The water would go to waterfall through piece of flexible tube. So the pump pumps water to the bog through flexible tube which is attached to the bottom pipe and another flexible tube attached on the opposite side of the pipe takes the water up to waterfall. The other 2 ends of pipe will be capped.
I gotta admit, I'm really confused. In order for the bog to do its job the water needs to leave the pipe altogether and just rise freely through the gravel in the 20 gallon tub from the bottom until it gets to the top of the tub. How will you recapture it at that point? Sorry if I'm missing something obvious.
for the water to 'takes the water up to waterfall', you're going to need another pump. The way bogs work is your pump pushes water up from your pond and then to the bottom of your bog. The water rises and spills (usually) back into your pond. There is no transfer 'up' to a higher elevation. The spill from your bog can become a waterfall; most do this. The only way to get water from bog to waterfall without another pump is for your bog spill to be higher than your waterfall and let the bog spill water into the waterfall you're envisioning. What I have is two feeds from each pump (I have two pumps in my pond, and two waterfalls, too); one feed goes to the bog inlet and the other goes directly to a waterfall. I have a ball valve on each to regulate how much each gets.
What you're describing is a bit confusing. Can you provide a sketch of what you're trying to accomplish?
It looks like it won't work the way I envisioned it. That's why I asked here.
If you're sending water via ONE feed from the pump in the pond TO a waterfall, AND another feed from the same pump to send water TO your bog, then yes, one pump will work. But you're saying; take the water from the pond, send to bog. THEN after the water is there, pump it to a waterfall. This requires two pumps, one in each position.I thought just one pump could handle both pumping water from pond to bog and again from bog to pond. Obviously not. Thanks for the clarification.
The sketch - just how the water goes to the piping and then to waterfall. I will probably re-think and go with the spillway like @Criscar suggested (thanks!)
I'd swap out all the corrugated flex tubing I see in your pics; there's been many threads/posts here complaining about leaks/durability of that type of hose. Get yourself some flex pvc instead.Here are some photos that might help you see what some of these forms look like in operation.
1) the mockup of what ended up being the final arrangement (I didn't yet have the tub with the waterfall spillway at that time, the first one I ordered got lost in shipping). 300 gal rubbermaid stock tank, 20 gallon tub with spillway on right, 7.5 gallon pond form feeding into 2.5 gallon pond form on left in back.
2) Just to give you an idea of flow force, I have a single tetracare 550 gph pump running both mini-bogs, and the waterfall is still pretty forceful even with a splitter in place diverting 40% of the flow to the other bog and both filled to the brim with pea gravel, so I would be careful about using a 500 gph pump on a 50 gallon pond. You might have to throttle it back so hard it wouldn't be worth it.
3) this is what it looks like to use a uniseal to enter the pond form. Here I have flex tubing going through it but in hindsight that was a bad choice. Even in this small form with relatively little gravel weight on the tubing once inside the form, it still took a crazy amount of silicone to prevent this from leaking. I really like the uniseals, and they are so cheap and easy to use, but were definitely designed to work with hard PVC piping, not flex tubing.
4) Here is the adaptor from flex tubing to PVC, and then the PVC goes through the barrel into the tub via a uniseal that doesn't leak at all.
5) eventually the plants will finish growing in and hide the black sides and rim and the cinderblocks
6) water has been beautifully clear with this setup, hoping it stays that way.
I will probably do that at some point, however, there is less than 2 feet of it that is actually out of the water, most of it is submerged, so I haven't been terribly worried about minor leaks. I saw the same posts but already had the flex tubing. Helpful advice for Sugar, though.I'd swap out all the corrugated flex tubing I see in your pics; there's been many threads/posts here complaining about leaks/durability of that type of hose. Get yourself some flex pvc instead.
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.