- Joined
- Jun 22, 2011
- Messages
- 4,684
- Reaction score
- 3,764
- Hardiness Zone
- 5b
- Country
if they truly used mortar, it wouldn't hold anyhow as it is not waterproof. Cement/concrete (which is made with cement) is, though. All said, cementing/mortaring stones like that seems pointless and surely won't hold. Exactly how arethe floating stones situated that they needed to be mortared? I'd assume there's a good base upon which they are sitting. Weight should hold them, imo, and should be stable without any bond to worry about. Sounds like there's a bit of engineering if you've got any cantilever effects going on.
That said, you might consider hydraulic cement; it's built for underwater situations.
The mortar will/might affect the pH as mentioned, but it depends on how much was used, as Lisa noted. I doubt a bead of morter would do much in a pond that size but if you're concerned, by all means drain and clean. If they used additives other than pure mortar, then of course the wildlife and flora might be affected adversely.
That said, you might consider hydraulic cement; it's built for underwater situations.
The mortar will/might affect the pH as mentioned, but it depends on how much was used, as Lisa noted. I doubt a bead of morter would do much in a pond that size but if you're concerned, by all means drain and clean. If they used additives other than pure mortar, then of course the wildlife and flora might be affected adversely.