Guess it's just up to Big Lou whether he wants his pond full up w/ leaves. I don't know how deep your pond is Lou but if it's fairly shallow seems like at some point it would become just muck and full of leaves and not much water. It actually could be just a big hole full of compost couldn't it? If it's deep enough then the leaves would have time to dissolve and particles would float out over the edge from rainwater. I'm just working all this out in my head right now and not saying this is fact. But isn't it true that a small puddle in the woods when fills up w/ leaves etc. will just eventually be a pile of muck? How deep does a wildlife pond have to be so that one could still enjoy seeing some water and not just muck? I think Lou still wants it to look nice too and not just see composting leaves.
Everyone's opinions and recommendations were read with great interest and certainly appreciated. I think the bottom line is that our pond is not big enough to deal with the abundant amount of leaves and such available.
I will be removing as many of the leaves as possible using a pole mounded pond bottom net rake and surface debris net. The depth of my pond varies with the deepest point being 3.5', length 22', width varies from about 4' to 11'. The water is and always has been crystal clear. I do believe there will be enough natural organic matter remaing in the pond to promote non-fish pond life. Happy to report we now have two frogs. In closing, the last professional cleaning cost $500! Massive amounts of foul smelling muck removed. Hopefully my now and then maintence will help us avoid such a high expense come late summer.
Varing opinions ARE good. It would be such a dull world if everyone agreed all of the time.
Thank you,
The Big Lou