Good Foods for Great Health

callingcolleen1

mad hatter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
9,432
Reaction score
8,128
Location
Medicine Hat Alberta, Canada (zone 2/3)
Hardiness Zone
4a
Country
Canada
The paper last week said it cost too much too arrest harmless people like me, and besides, I have medical rights too!! Ha ha ha!!

They are saving their money to catch really bad people who are doing really bad pharmaceutical drugs, and get those addicts first!! :)
 

j.w

I Love my Goldies
Joined
Feb 1, 2010
Messages
33,902
Reaction score
20,874
Location
Arlington, Washington
Showcase(s):
1
Hardiness Zone
USDA 8a
Country
United States
It's a $27 fine here now to smoke in public. Guess the fines will keep mounting up and then one day they will just give everyone leniency and make it all go up in smoke :biggrin: I guess you can smoke the grass on your own grass tho
 
Joined
Sep 18, 2012
Messages
4,523
Reaction score
3,717
Location
Desoto, Texas (Dallas County) North Texas, Zone 8a
Showcase(s):
1
Quite a contradiction since smoking is smoking. I do not support tobacco nor unrestricted weed use. Seems if tobacco smoking is banned in public then so should weed smoking. I'm sure my views are simplistic especially given I do not speak as state of Washington resident. More and more restrictions are being placed on tobacco users here. Difficult to define a fair and just policy
 

callingcolleen1

mad hatter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
9,432
Reaction score
8,128
Location
Medicine Hat Alberta, Canada (zone 2/3)
Hardiness Zone
4a
Country
Canada
"HARO" post="198847" timestamp="1387389108"]Around here we just elect them to some office or other! :banana:
John

Ya how is that Cracked up mayor in Toronto doing these days??? Fat chance they will get him out any time soon.... ha ha ha
 

callingcolleen1

mad hatter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
9,432
Reaction score
8,128
Location
Medicine Hat Alberta, Canada (zone 2/3)
Hardiness Zone
4a
Country
Canada
Big Lou.... big diference between smoking tobacco and smoking weed.... nobody every died from smoking too much weed!!!

they should have coffee "smoke houses" and parks, like they do in Europe! No need to hang my head in Shame... smoking weed is good for me!! :)
 

callingcolleen1

mad hatter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
9,432
Reaction score
8,128
Location
Medicine Hat Alberta, Canada (zone 2/3)
Hardiness Zone
4a
Country
Canada
I should also note that when my hubby first got told he had cancer right where he put the chewing tobacco, his blood pressure went right thru the roof and the hospital would not let him out till he had it under control... which was a few days after they gave him blood pressure medication. They should have hooked him up immediately to a hose attached to his face and fed him nice green soothing pot smoke, as that would have brought his blood pressure down within minutes!! BUT NO... he hates pot and does not want the stigma attached to being a "pot head"!! So he suffered with high blood pressure and took the "chemical" medication that took forever to get working...

We need to get rid of that stigma so people who need the medical pot can take it at the hospital in a special room!! :)
 

j.w

I Love my Goldies
Joined
Feb 1, 2010
Messages
33,902
Reaction score
20,874
Location
Arlington, Washington
Showcase(s):
1
Hardiness Zone
USDA 8a
Country
United States
I think the jury is still out on whether pot is hurting people's lungs or not. Here is one study they are talking about. I think the effects from the MJ may be good in lots of ways but the smoke is still damaging to the lungs. Just my opinion tho :biggrin:

ByRyan Jaslow CBS News January 10, 2012, 5: 07 PM

Is smoking marijuana bad for your lungs?
smokingpot_istock.jpg


(CBS) - Is smoking marijuana bad for your health? The question is often debated when it comes to medical marijuana, but a new study suggests if smoking pot is bad for your body, your lungs aren't bearing the brunt of the damage.
PICTURES: 17 stoner states: Where's marijuana use highest?
The study found occasional marijuana smoking did not negatively impact a person's lung function.
For the study, researchers performed routine pulmonary function tests on 5,115 young adults who were part 20-year study on coronary artery disease risk. The researchers wanted to test lung function against a person's "joint years" of life-time marijuana exposure. For example, if a person smoked one joint or pipe's worth of marijuana per week for 49 years, or if a person smoked one joint or pipe's worth per day for seven years, both people would be identified as having "7-joint-years" of marijuana exposure.
That might sound like a lot, but most of the marijuana smokers in this study were not heavy users, according to study co-author Dr. Stefan Kertesz, an associate professor of preventive medicine at the University of Alabama at Birmingham.
"This is not a study focused on the kinds of individuals you would see in treatment programs for chemical dependence or in the latest 'Harold and Kumar' movie," Kertesz told CBS News in an email. Kertesz said the median marijuana smokers in the study used roughly two to three joints per month, which may include some people who would smoke frequently but then stop for a long period of time.
What the researchers find?
"With up to 7 joint-years of life-time exposure, we found no evidence that increasing exposure to marijuana adversely affects pulmonary function," the researchers wrote in study, published in the Jan. 10 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association. In fact, the researchers found a slight increase in occasional marijuana smokers' lung function. That increase may be indicative of marijuana smokers taking deep breaths and holding the smoke in, the researchers said.
At more than 10 joint-years of marijuana exposure, the researchers saw a slight decline in lung function, but the researchers said that finding was not statistically significant, so could be due to chance. Cigarette smokers, who smoked a median of eight to nine cigarettes per day, saw a significant drop in lung function over the twenty year study.
"Marijuana may have beneficial effects on pain control, appetite, mood, and management of other chronic symptoms," the researchers wrote. "Our findings suggest that occasional use of marijuana for these or other purposes may not be associated with adverse consequences on pulmonary function."
The researchers said it's more difficult to determine if long-term, heavy marijuana use is worse for lungs - because that pattern of smoking was "relatively rare" among the study participants - but they said there was a need for caution and moderation when marijuana use is considered.
Is smoking marijuana easier on the lungs than smoking cigarettes?
Kertesz told CBS News that low doses of marijuana among users who aren't addicted, "seems to pose lower risk to lungs than the typical usage patterns of cigarette smoking."
But that doesn't mean it's good for your lungs. Kertesz said smoking marijuana irritates the airways, triggers cough and phlegm production, and could be especially dangerous for asthmatics. Also, since the participants were originally enrolled in a heart study, the researchers couldn't determine how many got lung cancer.
"So don't assume that there is 'no' risk no matter who you are," Kertesz said.
Dr. Robert Glatter, an emergency medicine physician at Lenox Hill Hospital in New York City, told CBS News in an email, "while casual marijuana use may not reflect an immediate decrease in lung function, marijuana smoke contains high levels of tar, which is bad for your health."
Glatter said smoking marijuana could lead to chronic coughing, wheezing and potentially chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
"Casual or recreational marijuana use is not a safe alternative to tobacco smoking."

Marijuana smoke not as damaging to lungs as cigarette smoke from uabnews on Vimeo.

© 2012 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
 

callingcolleen1

mad hatter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
9,432
Reaction score
8,128
Location
Medicine Hat Alberta, Canada (zone 2/3)
Hardiness Zone
4a
Country
Canada
JW if that study is correct... just smoking 10 joints a year could damage your Lungs?? Let me do the calculations.....based on my usage.... that would add up to Holy CRAP SHOULD be DEAD then! Ha ha ha ha...

Both my sister's have this thing (pipe) that burns the smoke without getting hot, and it is supposed to be good, but they cost like 200 dollars. It also burns the smoke with next to no smell either!
 

koiguy1969

GIGGETY-GIGGETY!!
Joined
Dec 15, 2008
Messages
10,587
Reaction score
6,409
Location
Michigan zone 5b
callingcolleen1 said:
JW if that study is correct... just smoking 10 joints a year could damage your Lungs?? Let me do the calculations.....based on my usage.... that would add up to Holy CRAP SHOULD be DEAD then! Ha ha ha ha...

Both my sister's have this thing (pipe) that burns the smoke without getting hot, and it is supposed to be good, but they cost like 200 dollars. It also burns the smoke with next to no smell either!
are you talking about vaporizing?... healthier choice. no smoke just a steam like vapor. no lung damage!! they work much like an electronic cigarette.
 

j.w

I Love my Goldies
Joined
Feb 1, 2010
Messages
33,902
Reaction score
20,874
Location
Arlington, Washington
Showcase(s):
1
Hardiness Zone
USDA 8a
Country
United States
I just wouldn't want to take the chance and be the guinea pig to find out if the smoke hurts your lungs in say 20yrs from now. If you are gonna smoke it then why not take the extra precaution and get that pipe? Your hubby would be sad if you ended up going through what he did and you could help it now. What does he think about the smoke doing damage to your lungs?
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
31,560
Messages
518,884
Members
13,807
Latest member
Roguewarrior0

Latest Threads

Top