waynefrcan
19 years ponding and hopefully 4 more!
Thanks Charles, I"m just tired of typing in this topic, we are going over the same facts over and over now.
So where is the out cry for Christopher Cervini??? Roderick Scott was a big man, who clearly had nothing to "fear" from three kids ... two of them ran, leaving one ... He had the more likely option of restraining Christopher, yet deadly force was used ... and he was found not guilty too ... as was right ... NOT GUILTY was correct....crsublette said:Yep, that is the problem when talking with the pro-Trayvon folk since they always have to manipulate the evidence to make up their own hypothetical stories, just like the prosecution and politicians had to manipulate the evidence to simply just get Zim arrested and avoid the grand jury.
They are more concerned about making Zim out to be the devil rather than helping the troubled youth, which Trayvon was a troubled youth.
dieselplower said:obama is clearly using this case to increase racial tension in an attempt to continue to weaken this country. I honestly don't know how this thread has gotten to 50 pages. The arguements of the people who side with Martin have been a joke. I have made a couple posts that they could not refute so all they do is ignore and continue on with the same nonsense over and over. A couple other posters have shot them down repeatedly as well. Then recently there have been comments so absurd all I can do is shake my head and roll my eyes. To me, the bottom line is that Martin tried to be tough one too many times. Other people will have their bottom line, and there is no way anyone can change that, so with that said, I'm gonna go read about fish.
CdnJCR said:Didn't mean to confuse you just pointing out how the new self defence laws in Canada would have likely resulted in the same verdict if applied to the Zimmerman trial.
capewind said:So where is the out cry for Christopher Cervini??? Roderick Scott was a big man, who clearly had nothing to "fear" from three kids ... two of them ran, leaving one ... He had the more likely option of restraining Christopher, yet deadly force was used ... and he was found not guilty too ... as was right ... NOT GUILTY was correct....
I think I need to make 1000 posts screaming racial favoritism ... Is it different because our first BLACK president (out of a white mother no less), wants to only profile or protect certain groups???
adavisus said:Blah... Blah.... Blah... Blah.... Blah... Blah.... Blah... Blah....
waynefrcan said:Charles are you posting on other sites regarding this case? I haven't looked for any as I don't have the time for it. I shouldn't even made the time to post on this one lol. I find these types of cases fasinating. I lost sleep when OJ walked lol. Maybe I'm a mental defective.
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.