This
garden blog referenced 2 creditable sources, but no links which always makes me suspicious. But still, worth tracking down. Data is data and I don't mind being wrong, if the data is there.
Through research at University of Georgia and Texas A&M University, it was found that applications of corn meal to ponds, especially those used for aquaculture, was effective in reducing or eliminating algae.
I haven't been able to find any University of Georgia or Texas A&M University cornmeal research. However here is a
funny article on using corn meal. The article it references also cites Texas A&M University research and I'm guessing the Boston garden blog above is probably talking about this same research which apparently has little or nothing to do with algae. Not sure because the Boston blog was only name dropping, not citing. Smells like typical internet story telling.
I'm starting to see the exact same cut-copy and pasted words being used and it looks like the source is
Howard Garrrett the Dirt Doctor. Not actually a doctor of anything, but that's fine, he does cite a source. Here's one from a
feed store that happens to sell cornmeal. The source cited seems to be
Aquaculture Engineering 9 (
1990)
pages 175-186 so that would be good to read. Couldn't find the pages online and the Phoenix public library web site is down. I'll check later.
I'm seeing "cellulose in the cornmeal helps tie up the excess phosphorous in water" as being what stops algae. That can be a separate thing to track down. However, I've seen this exact same type of thinking before, like the plants consuming all nitrates and the algae starves to death and it all dies. Trouble is algae and plants don't need phosphorous or nitrate to stay alive. These are used to build cells, for growth. So at best algae could slowly decline over a long period, but not the big die offs often cited. So I'm not overly optimistic. The cellulose removing phosphorous thing I assume would be part of something is growing on the decomposing cornmeal and using the phosphorous. I don't know, but that kind of logic is a reoccurring "logic" theme that never makes any sense outside of a lab.
I'm losing interest again.