Im thinking I need to return my tetra 1900 and get a tetra OFX2000 which consumes less energy, but I think it doesnt handle head as well so at the 2-3' of head it would have way less flow than the 1900, but Im not sure. max lift of the 1900 is stated at 192" or 16' and the OFX2000 is 6.8' and a GPH @ 2 ft. 1,325 and GPH @ 4 ft. 800 whereas I know the GPH of the 1900 is better. I have lets say 3' head and want like 1500-1700 gph at that height and the OFX2000 would give me less at like 1000gph. The 1900 is rated at 2 amps so like 220-240w. The OFX 2000 is 115w. So to get my flow I would need the OFX 3000 rated at GPH @ 2 ft. 2,450, GPH @ 4 ft. 2,000, GPH @ 6 ft.1,500, GPH @ 10 ft. 700. It is rated at 240w but the flow at 3’ is not ideal, but at the same consumption if I Ted off some of the flow to bypass the filter and go directly to the falls it could. I just like the fact that it collects debris better, but I think that is why it losses so much with head. It also costs a bit more from what I found, but on ebay for $230 shipped it is only like $70 more assuming it consumes the same amount of electricity it may be worth it. What do you think? Know where else could get one cheaper?
Would I have to T off cause at 2200gph on my 100 gal bucket it would be filled 22/hour or each gallon would be in there 2.7 minutes calculated with nothing in it so it would be even less really. Not long enough according to some post I’ve read, but another person says 3000gph is good for the 100gal. Just not sure how I would T off some of the flow and have it go directly to the waterfall. Maybe send it to the stream, but im just thinking it would be best to get 100% of the debri it collects into the bottom of my skippy filter or send it right back into the pond to be collected again, not have collect in the stream.
My smaller 550 at .45amps uses only 54w so I cant go to the OFX2000 there and im sure its not ideal for use in a fines filter anyways....what to do...
I got the info here
http://www.islandnet.com/~fountain/tetraofx.htm