Dave's pond Indiana said:
What is a moving bed filter? If it was my pond I would install a waterfall and put a nylon bag filed with lava rock in the waterfall and let the good bacteria take care of your algae. In my opinion UV is just a band aid.
Dave,
John has already addressed this, but for the sake of discussion I would like to add my own input. I agree with the moving bed filter system highly and I disagree with the static media bed filters which are akin to the skippy style filters.
The moving bed filters utilize a plastic media which has a great deal of surface area available for bacteria to colonize and set up shop upon. It becomes neutrally bouyant once the media has been colonized by the bacteria. A proper current of water and some gentle aeration drives the moving bed media to roll around inthe tank and bing bang into the individual pieces. This knocks off the old, dead bacteria from the media and makes room for the young, vibrant bacteria to take its place. The water and oxygen flow around the media enhances the Nitrosonomas nitrifying bacteria's environment and improves their efficiency at removing the ammonia and converting it to nitrites, then it also assists the Nitrobacter bacteria in their duty of converting the nitrite to nitrate. Plants in your pond system can then absorb the nitrates and the CO2 as fertilizer and increase the O2 levels.
In a static system (referring to a skippy type filter where the media remains stationary at all times) the environment is unique. The substrate or media is usually submerged most of the time and this means less O2 levels. The Skippy filters actually function as a mechanical filtration unit as well as a biological converter. However, if not maintained properly, an aenerobic bacteria colony could develop and thrive here and these bacteria do not do the job that you want them to.
They could actually make your biological conversion system dysfunctional and create more harm than good.
So why do so many people use skippy style filters? Because they are easy and inexpensive to construct.
What is wrong with the design? You MUST clean them often to prevent the muck buildup and the colinization of aenerobic bacteria.
Why is a moving bed system better? Because the system is nearly virtually a self cleaning filter system.
So what is the hitch here? Why doesn't everyone use a moving bed bio-converter system? Because you must also have a mechanical filtration system to screen out all the major particles first, before it gets to your moving bed filter. The moving bed filter is not there to perform mechanical filtering of leaf litter or large detritus, etc. It is performing the function of ammonia and nitrite removal (or conversion) and that is it's only purpose.
Wait a minute! Why can't you do this all in one vessel, as in the skippy filter design and let that just do it all? The reason I see is because when the skippy type filter becomes clogged with large debris, detritus and clogged to the point that the water flow through it diminishes, you must clean it. If this is the only filtration system in the line up, and it is where your bacteria colonies have set up home shop, you are going to wash away much of your beneficial bacteria during the cleaning cycle and now you will have to wait for those beneficial bacteria to repopulate again for the biological converter system to be at it's most effective level of operation. It is like you fired half or more of your manufacturing plant's workforce and now you have to hire new workers in a rush to keep the plant going and get it back up to speed.
The better design practice here is to have a mechanical filtration system ahead of the moving bed, biological conversion system and then all of your beneficial bacteria in the moving bed filter are never affected by your cleaning cycle of the mechanical filter. They are never disturbed and their habitat is maintained. Any aenerobic bacteria in the mechanical prefiltration vessels upstream are removed during routine cleaning, so no worries there.
I am not certain that I am correct on this subject or in my theories here, but to me it just seems logical.
Gordy