I'm 16 I don't know these huge words mean "subjective"
ill go from first to last question
Bad bacteria, possibly bad bacteria, removing bacteria isn't a bad thing and its not necessarily a good thing you just bluntly remove it. bacteria renews very quickly weather its beneficial or not, depending on "what" bacteria we are talking about.
Idk what the second part of what you said means mr. mad scientist. Clearer water isn't better, I didn't say that did I? no. I said it makes your water nice and clear. Clear water isn't bad either. It has its cons and pros. Like everything else. and Pros out ways the cons.
Removing bacteria
is a bad thing.
What you want is a healthy aquatic ecosystem that accommodates all bacteria at balanced levels. That can only be achieved by a stable environment where no bacteria is allowed to populate beyond a sustainable level.
What a water change does is reset the chemical parameters and requires bacteria populations to balance themselves out again.
That is called instability. Instability is not good for your fish.
You referred to happy fish, but how do you know they are happy? Is it because they are more active and darting around? That may be as a result from a water change and the fish are irritated as a result.
Whenever the chemical parameters of the water changes, the fishes osmoregulation must re equalize; see this:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osmoregulation
Basically, the fish are irritated because of the water change.
I wish I was a mad scientist, then I could focus on what interests me and someone else could pay the bills.
(maybe I could ask my wife to dress up and get me a coffee and clean the test tubes, but I'm not brave enough to request that)
I know you follow Tom Barr, but he focuses on plant growth and colouration, not aquatic ecosystem health.
.