I was thinking this as well. This is only a 3,5 ft post in total. It's not holding any weight like a fence. I think I will do no concrete. Maybe some crushed gravel.
Not river gravel (round) please. Sharp only, it locks together.
You sure posts in cement rot faster? That's all we ever have done here. Nobody puts up a fence without treated fence posts in cement, I mean in residential areas not rural.
Not sure, but am willing to bet cash. I am sure concreted posts are a bitch to replace. I am sure wet wood rots faster than dry wood. I am sure wood encased in concrete will always be wetter than wood in fast draining road base. I am sure putting up a fence goes super fast when the concrete is skipped, so it's worth the time to research the pros and cons.
When I built pole barns (holes with poles inserted and barn nailed to the poles) 30 years ago we filled the hole with soil, no concrete.
Google "wood post in concrete" for more opinions.
I was raised with concrete is always better for everything. About 20 years ago I first heard about not using concrete from a fence builder. He was a thinker and explained why concrete was dumb idea. Made sense to me. Back then there were few people who could be convinced. Now it seems like there's a lot of professionals who have ditched the concrete.
There are lots of variations. Some people do a layer of road base, then a layer of soil, etc. Some set the post on a bed of road base and fill the hole with road base and concrete the final 12" or so. I think local soil conditions may lead to different methods. But all the thinkers are trying to improve drainage.
You sure it adds strength? I know most people think it's true. But I also know most people know less than they think.
This is all more about fence posts and such where rot is an expensive issue. A post for an electric box is certainly no big deal to replace.