alisa;
just to weigh in as another Mi ponder; I lost 3 small gf and 2 medium sized, out of about 100 or so, in a 2800 gal pond, 4' at its deepest. I use only an airstone, suspended about 18" from the surface. This kept a hole open for almost all of our horrible (I agree with you whole heartedly!) winter. Sometime in mid Feb, the airline froze or something and the hole closed. Still, I didn't worry that much but after 2 weeks, I opened a hole with a heater I have for just such emergencies. Replaced the hose/air stone and let that continue until this spring finally arrived. What I did notice is that where I had the hole open and the ice was thinnest, there were few fish to be seen (when I could look into a wide enough opening); they all seemed to be under the remaining (and much thicker) ice plus its large layer of snow. One would have thought they'd have been closer to the other end, where the sun could do some good and where the air was rising. So, something to be learned, maybe, as to exactly where the warmer water really was. And I don't put my fish deaths to ice coverage as I lost too few for that to be an issue. ALL my large ones came through just fine as well as more than a few babies from late last summer.
I did post to a thread a while back noting that some experts seemed to think putting air in was fine as long as you didn't supercool the lower (and warmer in the winter) layer. They also noted that once you had over 5" of snow, that there was little to no light transmission through the snow/ice, and that clearing off the snow was a benefit. They did report problems with airlines being placed at the bottom of their ponds, and with too much aeration as well (too much water movement hence too much cooling). And realize that the amount of decaying matter in your pond also has an effect re buildup of toxic gases as well as sucking up available oxygen as well.
And here's another story to go with mine; we have a large public pond (probably an 2 acres, spring fed, deepest point at about 6', with a lot of plant matter) just down the road from me which had a large fish kill a couple of years ago, when the ice and snow never let up and the pond never thawed (as is more typical here in MI) in January. I mean a large kill; must have been hundreds of dead fish that year. This year, I expected the same as the winter was even more brutal. And yet, nothing. No dead fish that I could see. I figure the earlier purge must have made it easier for the survivors to come through this winter. No other reason I can see that there weren't any fish killed. I guess there was still enough oxygen and not enough gas buildup (to rob oxygen from the fish) to do any damage, despite the solid cover that lasted from December to almost April.
Take or toss what you will with this info.
Michael