- Joined
- May 6, 2014
- Messages
- 1
- Reaction score
- 0
Hello all,
I inherited a small pond with a waterfall when I purchased my home last year. The house sat empty for a year before we bought it, which also meant the pond and equipment sat for a year without running, and the pond was just green sludge, for the most part, but it still supported its several goldfish. I just invested money in a pump and pressure filter and cleaned the pond and my fish and I are very happy! However, everyday when I get home from work, the water level has dropped significantly. When the pond was sitting stagnant, it never lost water. I have checked for leaks in the hoses connecting my equipment, and I sealed up one tiny leak, but the water still drops. Is it possible that the length of the waterfall is the problem? It is about 15 feet long (maybe more), so there is plenty of opportunity for splashing on rocks and evaporation, I suppose. Any thoughts if this sounds reasonable? If so, I will have to figure out a way to use the waterfall but closer to the bottom of it to minimize the water loss. Having to refill it each day is getting expensive and I worry about my fish everyday when I am at work! One blessing is that our water is not chlorinated, and my fish are able to tolerate constant refilling of their pond.
Any thoughts are much appreciated!
I inherited a small pond with a waterfall when I purchased my home last year. The house sat empty for a year before we bought it, which also meant the pond and equipment sat for a year without running, and the pond was just green sludge, for the most part, but it still supported its several goldfish. I just invested money in a pump and pressure filter and cleaned the pond and my fish and I are very happy! However, everyday when I get home from work, the water level has dropped significantly. When the pond was sitting stagnant, it never lost water. I have checked for leaks in the hoses connecting my equipment, and I sealed up one tiny leak, but the water still drops. Is it possible that the length of the waterfall is the problem? It is about 15 feet long (maybe more), so there is plenty of opportunity for splashing on rocks and evaporation, I suppose. Any thoughts if this sounds reasonable? If so, I will have to figure out a way to use the waterfall but closer to the bottom of it to minimize the water loss. Having to refill it each day is getting expensive and I worry about my fish everyday when I am at work! One blessing is that our water is not chlorinated, and my fish are able to tolerate constant refilling of their pond.
Any thoughts are much appreciated!