- Joined
- Sep 18, 2020
- Messages
- 3,254
- Reaction score
- 3,527
- Location
- Pacific NW
- Hardiness Zone
- 8b
- Country
This is hypothetical because I don't actually have a pond yet. Just a big hole in the ground (see photo below). Bottom shelf is about 4' deep.
I'm trying to design this to be a light load fish pond that my family can also splash around in during the summer. There will be an intake bay and a wetland filter.
My liner is here, but I haven't put it in yet because I realized I haven't really thought about the bottom of the pond and if I should do something to keep it clean. I plan to either put in gravel or flagstone at the bottom.
My primary goal is for this pond to stay as clean and clear as possible with as little ongoing maintenance from me. I never want to drain and clean this thing if I can avoid it.
Over the last few days, I've pondered and researched several possible solutions to keeping the bottom of the pond debris free, all of them with their own pros and cons.
1. Install a bottom drain. I don't really like anything about the idea of a bottom drain except that it seems to work really well. I think it would be difficult to incorporate properly with an intake bay and is not really compatible with a gravel bottom. But I guess it would work okay with flagstones. I don't want to deal with settlement chambers or a sieve I have to clean all the time, though. I think this option is basically a no go for me.
2. Put jets near the bottom to push water up. Get some flow going down there and hopefully direct anything that makes it there back towards the surface where the skimming action of the intake bay can get it. Major benefit is that it's pretty easy to install. Downside is that I think you'd have to have a hell of a pump and some big pipes to accomplish any real sweeping activity with the head pressure you'd get at 4' deep. I think jets are normally installed near the surface for that reason.
3. Under gravel suction grid. I've seen this written about several times by folks who say it works amazingly and can be accomplished with low voltage air lift pumps. so low electric overhead. Would be easy enough to install, but not really compatible with an intake bay and a submersible pump. Think it would require me to get an external pump to properly control flow.
4. Under gravel pressure grid (bog on the bottom of the pond). I've also seen this done with an Aquascape snorkel and centipede. You're basically creating a bog at the bottom of your pond. Pretty much the same as the suction grid, but you're blowing water through it rather than sucking. This would work with an intake bay just fine. However, a snorkel to access the bottom with a pump is out of the question in my case. I don't want a huge pipe sticking up in the middle of my pond.
Honestly, at this point, I'm kind of thinking I might just do nothing and hope for the best. Keep It Simple, Stupid. Seems to work pretty well for a lot of people. Why not for me?
If you're a big fan of one of these systems and see how it could for a pond like mine, I'm all ears. Or if I've missed an option that I should consider, let me know.
I'm trying to design this to be a light load fish pond that my family can also splash around in during the summer. There will be an intake bay and a wetland filter.
My liner is here, but I haven't put it in yet because I realized I haven't really thought about the bottom of the pond and if I should do something to keep it clean. I plan to either put in gravel or flagstone at the bottom.
My primary goal is for this pond to stay as clean and clear as possible with as little ongoing maintenance from me. I never want to drain and clean this thing if I can avoid it.
Over the last few days, I've pondered and researched several possible solutions to keeping the bottom of the pond debris free, all of them with their own pros and cons.
1. Install a bottom drain. I don't really like anything about the idea of a bottom drain except that it seems to work really well. I think it would be difficult to incorporate properly with an intake bay and is not really compatible with a gravel bottom. But I guess it would work okay with flagstones. I don't want to deal with settlement chambers or a sieve I have to clean all the time, though. I think this option is basically a no go for me.
2. Put jets near the bottom to push water up. Get some flow going down there and hopefully direct anything that makes it there back towards the surface where the skimming action of the intake bay can get it. Major benefit is that it's pretty easy to install. Downside is that I think you'd have to have a hell of a pump and some big pipes to accomplish any real sweeping activity with the head pressure you'd get at 4' deep. I think jets are normally installed near the surface for that reason.
3. Under gravel suction grid. I've seen this written about several times by folks who say it works amazingly and can be accomplished with low voltage air lift pumps. so low electric overhead. Would be easy enough to install, but not really compatible with an intake bay and a submersible pump. Think it would require me to get an external pump to properly control flow.
4. Under gravel pressure grid (bog on the bottom of the pond). I've also seen this done with an Aquascape snorkel and centipede. You're basically creating a bog at the bottom of your pond. Pretty much the same as the suction grid, but you're blowing water through it rather than sucking. This would work with an intake bay just fine. However, a snorkel to access the bottom with a pump is out of the question in my case. I don't want a huge pipe sticking up in the middle of my pond.
Honestly, at this point, I'm kind of thinking I might just do nothing and hope for the best. Keep It Simple, Stupid. Seems to work pretty well for a lot of people. Why not for me?
If you're a big fan of one of these systems and see how it could for a pond like mine, I'm all ears. Or if I've missed an option that I should consider, let me know.