SE18
David V
I'm using a T connection with 1" corrugated hose. One section of the T returns a portion of the flow back to the pond where the pump is located, while the other section goes to the head of the waterway (upstream). Of course the other section is from the pump.
The reason I have this configuration is b/c the flow from the pump is too much for the waterway, but as the waterway is extended in the future further upstream, more flow will be required.
My problem is regulating the flow between the pond and the upstream section. I'm currently using two small flat bars of steel, each with 2 holes and both sections joined with bolts, to compress the hose. The solution works but is not elegant and I'm thinking might eventually damage the hose. Also, I have to tighten or loosen the bolts, which is a headache, when I want to "tweak" the flow.
I don't want to spend a heap of money on a flow control valve but if there's one out there made for corrugated plastic 1" tubing that isn't costly (
The reason I have this configuration is b/c the flow from the pump is too much for the waterway, but as the waterway is extended in the future further upstream, more flow will be required.
My problem is regulating the flow between the pond and the upstream section. I'm currently using two small flat bars of steel, each with 2 holes and both sections joined with bolts, to compress the hose. The solution works but is not elegant and I'm thinking might eventually damage the hose. Also, I have to tighten or loosen the bolts, which is a headache, when I want to "tweak" the flow.
I don't want to spend a heap of money on a flow control valve but if there's one out there made for corrugated plastic 1" tubing that isn't costly (