- Joined
- Jul 27, 2019
- Messages
- 93
- Reaction score
- 27
- Country
Algea problems as seen in this thread....https://www.gardenpondforum.com/threads/algea-bug-finally-got-me.27986/
Soooooo, I went ahead with a full pond power wash from top to bottom. No chemicals/cleaners, just water. Pond is roughly 900 gallons and I was able to save about 150 gallons and added it back. YES, I know this is not a well liked method around here but the algae was growing so fast and was beginning to completely cover my box filters. The filters were clogging and the flow was heavily restricted.
In addition to adding more plants, I am contemplating a UV filter so I need some advice. When considering the layout of all the plumbing/hoses and wanting to keep all equipment either inside the water itself or hidden along the perimeter, I believe I have 2 options for the actual placement of the UV filter
1)submerged and on the bottom of the pond. UV filter will be placed right after both box filters but before the pump.
-Pros: MUCH more water flow through the filter. Pump is rated for 900GPH with 1" tubing and UV filter would be placed right before the pump inlet
-Cons: submerged. difficult to change the bulb but not impossible (I get in the pond quite often to clean the box filters). Possible leaking seal for light even though some units are rated for submersion
2)placed out of water and plumbed in directly behind the spitting frog.
-Pros: Out of the water, easy bulb changes/maintenance
-Cons: MUCH MUCH less water flow through the frog. The pump exits through the small water fountain in the left of the pic with 1"tubing and T's off to the frog with 1/2" tubing.
There is no option for placing the filter in the waterfall hose
Obviously I would like to filter as much water as possible through the UV which makes the submerged option stand out....BUT....above water behind the frog is soooo much easier.
Will the UV be beneficial enough for my pond placed behind the frog with much less water flow?
Soooooo, I went ahead with a full pond power wash from top to bottom. No chemicals/cleaners, just water. Pond is roughly 900 gallons and I was able to save about 150 gallons and added it back. YES, I know this is not a well liked method around here but the algae was growing so fast and was beginning to completely cover my box filters. The filters were clogging and the flow was heavily restricted.
In addition to adding more plants, I am contemplating a UV filter so I need some advice. When considering the layout of all the plumbing/hoses and wanting to keep all equipment either inside the water itself or hidden along the perimeter, I believe I have 2 options for the actual placement of the UV filter
1)submerged and on the bottom of the pond. UV filter will be placed right after both box filters but before the pump.
-Pros: MUCH more water flow through the filter. Pump is rated for 900GPH with 1" tubing and UV filter would be placed right before the pump inlet
-Cons: submerged. difficult to change the bulb but not impossible (I get in the pond quite often to clean the box filters). Possible leaking seal for light even though some units are rated for submersion
2)placed out of water and plumbed in directly behind the spitting frog.
-Pros: Out of the water, easy bulb changes/maintenance
-Cons: MUCH MUCH less water flow through the frog. The pump exits through the small water fountain in the left of the pic with 1"tubing and T's off to the frog with 1/2" tubing.
There is no option for placing the filter in the waterfall hose
Obviously I would like to filter as much water as possible through the UV which makes the submerged option stand out....BUT....above water behind the frog is soooo much easier.
Will the UV be beneficial enough for my pond placed behind the frog with much less water flow?